This commit is contained in:
Dan Frumin 2019-06-12 17:52:53 +02:00
parent aa65e1af67
commit 0c55194a2f
4 changed files with 43 additions and 40 deletions

59
Hoare.v
View File

@ -1,10 +1,11 @@
Require Import Coq.Program.Equality.
From stdpp Require Import base tactics.
Require Import ImpSimpl. Require Import ImpSimpl.
Require Import base tactics. (* For typeclasses; obtained from <http://robbertkrebbers.nl/research/ch2o/> *)
(** * Basic definition *) (** * Basic definition *)
(** (From ImpSimpl.v) We assume big-step semantics [exec v c v'] representing that [c], if (** (From ImpSimpl.v) We assume big-step semantics [exec v c v'] representing that [c], if
executed in a state [v], results in the state [v']. executed in a state [v], results in the state [v'].
In this semantics the state is just a valuation of variables. We In this semantics the state is just a valuation of variables. We
assume that we can evaluate a boolean expression [be] in a state [v] assume that we can evaluate a boolean expression [be] in a state [v]
@ -35,7 +36,7 @@ Proof. intros P Q R HPQ HQR v. intuition. Qed.
postcondition) and a program [c], we write [hoare_interp P c Q v] if, postcondition) and a program [c], we write [hoare_interp P c Q v] if,
supposing the precondition [P] holds at the state [v], and [c] supposing the precondition [P] holds at the state [v], and [c]
evaluates to state [v'] from state [v], we can show that the evaluates to state [v'] from state [v], we can show that the
postcondition [Q] holds at the state [v']. postcondition [Q] holds at the state [v'].
If this holds for all states [v], we say that the triple (P, Q, c) is If this holds for all states [v], we say that the triple (P, Q, c) is
_valid_, written as [hoare_valid P c Q]. _valid_, written as [hoare_valid P c Q].
@ -56,7 +57,7 @@ and we use the notation [{{P}} c {{Q}}] as a shorthand for
Inductive hoare_triple : assertion -> cmd -> assertion -> Prop := Inductive hoare_triple : assertion -> cmd -> assertion -> Prop :=
| HtSkip : forall P, hoare_triple P Skip P | HtSkip : forall P, hoare_triple P Skip P
| HtAssign : forall (P : assertion) x e, | HtAssign : forall (P : assertion) x e,
hoare_triple P (Assign x e) hoare_triple P (Assign x e)
(fun v => exists v', P v' /\ v = (<[x := eval e v']>v')) (fun v => exists v', P v' /\ v = (<[x := eval e v']>v'))
| HtSeq : forall (P Q R : assertion) c1 c2, | HtSeq : forall (P Q R : assertion) c1 c2,
hoare_triple P c1 Q hoare_triple P c1 Q
@ -76,18 +77,18 @@ P' ==> P {P} c {Q} Q ==> Q'
{P'} c {Q'} {P'} c {Q'}
>> >>
*) *)
| HtConsequence : forall (P Q P' Q' : assertion) c, | HtConsequence : forall (P Q P' Q' : assertion) c,
hoare_triple P c Q hoare_triple P c Q
-> P' ==> P -> Q ==> Q' -> P' ==> P -> Q ==> Q'
-> hoare_triple P' c Q' -> hoare_triple P' c Q'
(** (**
<< <<
a {P(a)} c {Q} a {P(a)} c {Q}
----------------- -----------------
{a.P(a)} c {Q} {a.P(a)} c {Q}
>> >>
*) *)
| HtExists : forall A (P : A -> assertion) (Q: assertion) c, | HtExists : forall A (P : A -> assertion) (Q: assertion) c,
(forall (a:A), hoare_triple (P a) c (Q)) (forall (a:A), hoare_triple (P a) c (Q))
-> hoare_triple (fun v => exists a, P a v) c Q -> hoare_triple (fun v => exists a, P a v) c Q
@ -145,7 +146,7 @@ Proof.
try (inversion E; subst; by eauto). try (inversion E; subst; by eauto).
intro. intro.
eapply hoare_triple_big_step_while; eauto. eapply hoare_triple_big_step_while; eauto.
intros [a HP]. eapply H0; eassumption. intros [a HP]. eapply H0; eassumption.
Qed. Qed.
@ -154,7 +155,7 @@ Qed.
(** * (Syntactic) Weakest precondition *) (** * (Syntactic) Weakest precondition *)
(** Syntactic definition of a weakest precondition *) (** Syntactic definition of a weakest precondition *)
Fixpoint wpl (c : cmd) (Q : assertion) : assertion := Fixpoint wpl (c : cmd) (Q : assertion) : assertion :=
match c with match c with
| Skip => Q | Skip => Q
| Assign x E => fun v => Q (<[ x := eval E v ]>v) | Assign x E => fun v => Q (<[ x := eval E v ]>v)
@ -183,12 +184,12 @@ Proof.
inversion E; subst; rewrite H4; intro wplHods. inversion E; subst; rewrite H4; intro wplHods.
eapply IHs1; eauto. eapply IHs1; eauto.
eapply IHs2; eauto. eapply IHs2; eauto.
dependent induction E; intros [Inv [L1 L2]]. eapply L2; eauto. dependent induction E; intros [Inv [L1 L2]]. eapply L2; eauto.
assert (Inv v2) as Inv_v2 by (eapply IHs; eauto; eapply L2; eauto). assert (Inv v2) as Inv_v2 by (eapply IHs; eauto; eapply L2; eauto).
assert (wpl (While_ be s) Q v2) as RealInv by (simpl;eauto). assert (wpl (While_ be s) Q v2) as RealInv by (simpl;eauto).
eapply IHE2; eauto. eapply IHE2; eauto.
Qed. Qed.
Hint Resolve ExSkip ExAssign ExSeq ExIfTrue ExIfFalse ExWhileFalse ExWhileTrue. Hint Resolve ExSkip ExAssign ExSeq ExIfTrue ExIfFalse ExWhileFalse ExWhileTrue.
@ -207,7 +208,7 @@ Theorem wpl_complete_sem (c : cmd) (P Q : assertion) :
Proof. Proof.
generalize dependent Q. generalize dependent P. generalize dependent Q. generalize dependent P.
induction c; simpl; intros P Q v HT Pv. intuition; by eauto. unfold hoare_interp in HT. induction c; simpl; intros P Q v HT Pv. intuition; by eauto. unfold hoare_interp in HT.
try (intuition; by eauto). try (intuition; by eauto).
(** Case [c = c1;c2]. By the first induction hypothesis, to show that [wpl c1 (wpl c2 Q)] holds it suffices to show that [{P} c1 {wpl c2 Q}] holds. *) (** Case [c = c1;c2]. By the first induction hypothesis, to show that [wpl c1 (wpl c2 Q)] holds it suffices to show that [{P} c1 {wpl c2 Q}] holds. *)
eapply IHc1 with (P:=P); eauto. eapply IHc1 with (P:=P); eauto.
@ -228,14 +229,14 @@ hypothesis. *)
(* TODO: pull this out in a separate lemma *) (* TODO: pull this out in a separate lemma *)
exists (WeP (While_ be c) Q). exists (WeP (While_ be c) Q).
split. unfold WeP; intuition. split. unfold WeP; intuition.
intro e. split. intro e. split.
intros [Cond W]. unfold WeP in W. intros [Cond W]. unfold WeP in W.
eapply IHc with (WeP (While_ be c) Q). intros e' ? ?. intros e'' ?. eapply IHc with (WeP (While_ be c) Q). intros e' ? ?. intros e'' ?.
eapply W. eapply ExWhileTrue with e'; eassumption. eapply W. eapply ExWhileTrue with e'; eassumption.
eassumption. eassumption.
intros [Cond W]. unfold WeP in W. intros [Cond W]. unfold WeP in W.
eapply W. eapply ExWhileFalse. eapply W. eapply ExWhileFalse.
eassumption. eassumption.
Qed. Qed.
@ -255,7 +256,7 @@ Qed.
Theorem wpl_entailment' (c : cmd) (P Q : assertion) : Theorem wpl_entailment' (c : cmd) (P Q : assertion) :
forall v, (P v -> wpl c Q v) -> hoare_interp P c Q v. forall v, (P v -> wpl c Q v) -> hoare_interp P c Q v.
Proof. Proof.
intros v H v' E Pv. intros v H v' E Pv.
eapply wpl_sound_sem; eauto. eapply wpl_sound_sem; eauto.
Qed. Qed.
@ -267,35 +268,35 @@ Theorem wpl_mon (c : cmd) (Q Q' : assertion) :
Proof. generalize dependent Q. generalize dependent Q'. Proof. generalize dependent Q. generalize dependent Q'.
induction c; simpl; intros Q' Q HQ v; intuition. induction c; simpl; intros Q' Q HQ v; intuition.
eapply IHc1; eauto. eapply IHc1; eauto.
destruct (beval be v); intuition. eapply IHc1; eauto. eapply IHc2; eauto. destruct (beval be v); intuition. eapply IHc1; eauto. eapply IHc2; eauto.
destruct H as [I [HI HII]]. destruct H as [I [HI HII]].
exists I; intuition; eauto. eapply IHc. reflexivity. eapply HII; eauto. exists I; intuition; eauto. eapply IHc. reflexivity. eapply HII; eauto.
eapply HQ. eapply HII; eauto. eapply HQ. eapply HII; eauto.
Qed. Qed.
(** ** Syntactic soundness of [wpl] and relative completeness of the Hoare logic *) (** ** Syntactic soundness of [wpl] and relative completeness of the Hoare logic *)
(** Finally, we can prove the syntactic soundness of [wpl] *) (** Finally, we can prove the syntactic soundness of [wpl] *)
Theorem wpl_soundness_synt (s : cmd) (Q : assertion) : Theorem wpl_soundness_synt (s : cmd) (Q : assertion) :
{{ wpl s Q }} s {{Q}}. {{ wpl s Q }} s {{Q}}.
Proof. Proof.
generalize dependent Q. dependent induction s; generalize dependent Q. dependent induction s;
try (simpl; intuition; by ht1); intro Q. try (simpl; intuition; by ht1); intro Q.
- simpl. eapply HtStrengthenPost. eapply HtAssign. - simpl. eapply HtStrengthenPost. eapply HtAssign.
intros v [v' [S1 S2]]. rewrite S2; assumption. intros v [v' [S1 S2]]. rewrite S2; assumption.
- simpl. eapply HtStrengthenPost. - simpl. eapply HtStrengthenPost.
eapply HtIf; eapply HtWeakenPre. eapply HtIf; eapply HtWeakenPre.
eapply IHs1. intros v [WP C]; eapply IHs1. intros v [WP C];
rewrite C in *; eassumption. rewrite C in *; eassumption.
eapply IHs2. intros v [WP C]; eapply IHs2. intros v [WP C];
rewrite C in *; eassumption. rewrite C in *; eassumption.
intro v. intuition. intro v. intuition.
- simpl. eapply HtExists; intro I. - simpl. eapply HtExists; intro I.
set (Istrong:=(fun v => I v /\ ( x : valuation, set (Istrong:=(fun v => I v /\ ( x : valuation,
((beval be x = true) I x wpl s I x) ((beval be x = true) I x wpl s I x)
((beval be x = false) I x Q x)))). ((beval be x = false) I x Q x)))).
@ -313,8 +314,8 @@ Proof.
unfold Istrong; unfold Istrong;
intros v [[Iv IU] beq]. split. eapply IU; eauto. assumption. intros v [[Iv IU] beq]. split. eapply IU; eauto. assumption.
intros v [HWP IU]. intros v [HWP IU].
generalize v HWP; clear v HWP. generalize v HWP; clear v HWP.
eapply wpl_mon. intros v' HI. unfold Istrong; intuition. eapply wpl_mon. intros v' HI. unfold Istrong; intuition.
} }
{ {

View File

@ -1,10 +1,6 @@
(** This file is a slight modification of ImpSimpl.v from Adam (** This file is a slight modification of ImpSimpl.v from Adam
Chilipala's FRAP: <http://adam.chlipala.net/frap/> *) Chilipala's FRAP: <http://adam.chlipala.net/frap/> *)
From stdpp Require Import stringmap natmap.
Require Import String.
(** We use Robbert's prelude from <http://robbertkrebbers.nl/research/ch2o/> *)
Require Import stringmap natmap.
(** Here's some appropriate syntax for expressions (side-effect-free) of a simple imperative language with a mutable memory. *) (** Here's some appropriate syntax for expressions (side-effect-free) of a simple imperative language with a mutable memory. *)
Inductive exp := Inductive exp :=
@ -86,14 +82,14 @@ Infix "*" := Mult : cmd_scope.
Infix "=" := Equal : cmd_scope. Infix "=" := Equal : cmd_scope.
Infix "<" := Less : cmd_scope. Infix "<" := Less : cmd_scope.
Definition set (dst src : exp) : cmd := Definition set (dst src : exp) : cmd :=
match dst with match dst with
| Var dst' => Assign dst' src | Var dst' => Assign dst' src
| _ => Assign "Bad LHS" 0 | _ => Assign "Bad LHS" 0
end. end.
Infix "<-" := set (no associativity, at level 70) : cmd_scope. Infix "<-" := set (no associativity, at level 70) : cmd_scope.
Infix ";;" := Seq (right associativity, at level 75) : cmd_scope. Infix ";;;" := Seq (right associativity, at level 70) : cmd_scope.
Notation "'when' b 'then' then_ 'else' else_ 'done'" := (If_ b then_ else_) (at level 75, b at level 0). Notation "'when' b 'then' then_ 'else' else_ 'done'" := (If_ b then_ else_) (at level 75, b at level 0).
Notation "{{ I }} 'while' b 'loop' body 'done'" := (While_ b body) (at level 75). Notation "'while' b 'loop' body 'done'" := (While_ b body) (at level 75).
Delimit Scope cmd_scope with cmd. Delimit Scope cmd_scope with cmd.
Infix "+" := plus : reset_scope. Infix "+" := plus : reset_scope.

View File

@ -1,12 +1,12 @@
CH2O=/Users/dan/projects/ch2o-new/ CH2O=/Users/dan/projects/ch2o-new/
ImpSimpl.vo: ImpSimpl.v ImpSimpl.vo: ImpSimpl.v
coqc -R $(CH2O) ch2o ImpSimpl.v coqc ImpSimpl.v
Hoare.vo: Hoare.v ImpSimpl.vo Hoare.vo: Hoare.v ImpSimpl.vo
coqc -R $(CH2O) ch2o Hoare.v coqc Hoare.v
all: Hoare.vo all: Hoare.vo
doc: ImpSimpl.vo Hoare.vo doc: ImpSimpl.vo Hoare.vo
coqdoc -R $(CH2O) ch2o ImpSimpl.v Hoare.v coqdoc ImpSimpl.v Hoare.v

6
README Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
A simple formulation of Hoare logic for a WHILE-language, with a proof of /relative completeness/:
If a triple { P } s { Q } is valid in the model, then it is derivable
using the rules in Hoare.v (see the inductive type `hoare_triple`).
Requires std++: <https://gitlab.mpi-sws.org/iris/stdpp>.